Issue - meetings

Environmental Services and Sustainability Portfolio

To consider report PES/363 of the Head of Economy and Planning, which was referred to the meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Commission held on 22 June 2020.

The Cabinet Member for Environmental Services and Sustainability presented report PES/363 of the Head of Economy and Planning which set out details of the draft Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP); a costed plan developed in line with Department for Transport guidance that aimed to establish borough-wide cycling and walking areas through a programme of infrastructure improvements.  The draft LCWIP was to be approved for public consultation in order to identify further areas for inclusion in the Plan.

Councillor Rana presented the Overview and Scrutiny Commission’s comments on the report to the Cabinet following consideration of the matter at its meeting on 22 June 2020, which included:

·         The need to instil public confidence in cycling and walking through separate space for cycling lanes, bike security and encouraging active travel.  On balance, those who were not able to easily travel should not be at a disadvantage by the infrastructure established.

·         Acknowledgement that five sets of cycle counters were in place to evaluate cycle trips. Whilst not monitoring speed it was proposed that all newly developed cycle routes would include a plan for monitoring and evaluating their use and effectiveness.

·         Concern was raised regarding some of the traffic management plans proposed within the appendices.  It was noted these may have a detrimental effect on other users and it was therefore suggested that it would be beneficial that ward and county councillors were included in the consultation of any potential scheme.

Councillor Crow was invited to speak on the item.  Matters raised included the costing of the LCWIP, which was estimated at £23.5 million, and the possibility that the LCWIP could be seen by members of the public to penalise motorists instead of ensuring a balance to benefit all road and pavement users.

All Cabinet Members present spoke as part of the discussion and expressed general approval for the proposals in the report.  Discussion occurred on parking, the climate emergency, and air quality in the borough, as well as the need to ensure the safety of cyclists and pedestrians.  It was noted that the cost of the proposed plans was an estimate.  The Cabinet also noted that the plans formed part of a national Government initiative to improve walking and cycling infrastructure.

Upon receiving a query regarding who was to be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the proposed plans in the LCWIP, the Cabinet Member for Environmental Services and Sustainability suggested that this would fall to the Highways authority at WSCC.

A recorded vote was taken on the recommendations in accordance with the Council’s Virtual Committee Procedure Rules.  The names of the Councillors voting for and against the recommendations, along with any abstentions, are recorded as set out below:

For the recommendations:

Councillors Irvine, Jhans, Lamb, Mullins, and P Smith. (5)

Against the recommendations:

None.

Abstentions:

None.

RESOLVED

That the Cabinet:

a)         approves the draft Crawley LCWIP that has been developed for consultation

b)         delegates authority to the Head of Economy and Planning*, in consultation with the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 10

To consider report PES/363 of the Head of Economy and Planning.

The Commission considered report PES/363 of the Head of Economy and Planning. The report sought approval for the draft Crawley LCWIP for consultation.

During the discussion with the Cabinet Member for Environmental Services and Sustainability, Head of Economy and Planning and the Sustainability Manager, the following comments were made:

·       Officers were commended on a detailed and interesting report.

·       Recognition that Crawley’s cycling and walking numbers were below the county average, mainly due to safety, busy roads and connectivity.

·       It was noted there was a need to instil public confidence in cycling and walking through separate space for cycling lanes, bike security and encouraging active travel. 

·       Acknowledgement that five sets of cycle counters were in place to evaluate cycle trips. Whilst not monitoring speed it was proposed that all newly developed cycle routes would include a plan for monitoring and evaluating their use and effectiveness.

·       General support for the report, and to encourage access throughout the town however those who were not able to easily travel should not be at a disadvantage by the infrastructure established. There needed to be a balance.

·       Concern was raised regarding some of the traffic management plans proposed within the appendices.  It was noted these may have a detrimental effect on other users and it was therefore suggested that it would be beneficial that ward and county councillors were included in the consultation of any potential scheme. 

RESOLVED

That the Commission notes the report and requests that the views expressed during the debate, are fed back to the Cabinet through the Commission’s Comment sheet.