Decision Maker: Cabinet, Full Council
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
The Cabinet will be asked to consider the
reasons behind the rental overcharge, the actions being taken to
rectify this and the associated financial impact; and ask that Full
Council approved the necessary financial changes
That the Cabinet:
notes the reasons behind, and the actions being
taken to rectify, the rent overcharge
b) endorses that Full Council makes the necessary financial provision for both for the refund of rent and the lower income anticipated within the Housing Revenue Account in both the current and future years.
The Cabinet recommends to Full Council to
a) Note and comment on the reasons behind, and the actions being taken to rectify, the rent overcharge.
b) Agree the necessary financial provision for both for the refund of rent and the lower income anticipated within the Housing Revenue Account in both the current and future years. The cost in the current and future financial years will result in less resource to fund future housing.
Note that the cost of the refunds made to tenants/DWP will impact
in the current financial year the sum that will be transferred to
the major repairs reserve for investment in future housing stock.
This will be in reported in the Quarter 3 Budget Monitoring
Reasons for the Recommendations
a) In April 2021 the Council was contacted by the Regulator for Social Housing following a first mandatory data return about the setting of target rents. The Council was identified as an outlier in that its target rents were higher than the Government’s formula rent and valuations suggested they should be.
b) Forensic investigation identified that the issue dates back to changes to the Tenancy Agreement agreed in October 2013 and implemented in April 2014. One of the changes implemented was to move from charging rent based on a 48-week year to a 52-week year. Actual rents were changed but the target rents on the system were not. This has affected 2,259 tenancies, of which 1,757 are current tenancies.
c) Existing tenancies were not affected by this change, and neither have new tenancies within properties built since April 2014. New tenancies since April 2014 within properties that pre-date April 2014 have consequently been overcharged in the region of 8%.
d) Tenants have paid the rent they would have signed up to pay as part of their Tenancy Agreement, but that rent level was set higher than it ought to have been. Given that rents have been set as part of a valid Tenancy Agreement and that all subsequent actions have been taken in line with that Tenancy Agreement, the Council has acted legally throughout.
e) The Leader and Cabinet Member were informed at the end of April 2021 and were clear that this needed to be resolved consistent with natural justice and transparency, and as quickly as possible. The Leader of the Opposition Group was also informed and agreed this needed to be resolved in a way that had the least possible impact on residents, and that wider communication should be at a time when the Council was ready to rectify the problem.
Given the scale and complexity of the issue it has
taken a number of months to put everything in place in order to
proceed. All members and all affected tenants have been informed
and from mid-November steps are being taken to reset the rents at
the correct level and to refund all tenancies affected. These steps
have been taken under existing delegated powers, but it is
important that there is an official record of the steps being taken
and the need to make the necessary financial
Report author: Ian Duke
Publication date: 25/11/2021
Date of decision: 24/11/2021
Decided at meeting: 24/11/2021 - Cabinet